archive support: ZIP, RAR, 7-ZIP, GZIP, BZIP2, AR/IPK, ISO9660, RPM (browsing, selectively unpack, delete, browsing archives in archives etc. DROPBOX integration with exporting and importing app's settings built-in text file editor with SYNTAX coloring built-in clients for connection to remote volumes using SSH/SFTP, FTP/FTPS, SMB, AFP, WebDAV protocols MERGING content of folders when copying or moving copying and moving files/folders in BACKGROUND (non blocking GUI file operations) support for COLOR definition based on the file's extension or attributes definition of CUSTOM TOOLS as menu items and toolbar items full UI customization (Fonts, Colors, Behaviour, Actions, Toolbar) WITH CRAX Commander FILE MANAGEMENT IS MUCH FASTER and EASIER than it has been before. CRAX Commander provides many of functionalities you need to quickly and effectively access and manage your local and remote files. It is integrated with Subversion and it has built-in FTP/FTPS, SFTP/SSH,WebDAV,SMB,AFP client functionality. (I don't care about startup times, I start my filemanager once and then only start it again if it crashed or if I need to reboot.)Īlso tried marta: definitely a very promising filemanager, lacking a few features yet (but nothing too big), also having already a few features that NC doesn't have: e.g.CRAX Commander is dual-pane file manager with approachable user interface. with big folders is bad (haven't tried) I'm not sure whether it'll have a bright future. That would be a great feature for NC as well After a short while it captured my favorite folders and I did not even miss a favorites menu as Cmd+P looked superiour. CRAX provides many of functionalities you need to quickly and effectively access and manage your local and remote files. It is integrated with Subversion 1.6 and it has built-in FTP, SSH client functionality. Merely a high five for Mike and his efficient coding.Īlso recently tried fman, too basic yet (even tabs are missing), BUT: the Cmd+P action is genius. CRAX Commander is dual-pane file manager with approachable user interface. Up and down keys were pressed so one can see when the UI is responsive again.Īgain, not meant as a scientific benchmark (but I could reproduce it on a different MBP, same results). Unfortunately, QuickTime doesn't capture the actual spinning beachball but displays a plain cursor instead. fman has slowest startup time, takes over 30 seconds to load the folder. CRAX and Commander One noticeable delay of about 1 sec (CRAX has a annoying startup nag screen) Followed by Marta, only slightly slower NC has fastest startup time and opening folder time, almost no delay press Enter (can be seen by Ke圜astr overlay) select test folder (10.000 files) with click Compare price, features, and reviews of the software side-by-side to make the best choice for your business. start the app by double-clicking, same starting folder (/tmp) on both panels Shrestha Files Pro X using this comparison chart. Simple timer and running applications shown. The MBP was just restarted, nothing else running. Thumbs up!įastest I've found so far is Rixstep Xfile – – but it has very rudimentary functionality, so in that regard it's no match for any of the other applications.Īlso agreed, but as you said, not an OFM and therefore not considered.įor you guys interested, here's a quick-and-dirty video of my comparison. Here, NC and Marta were fastest, then CRAX and COne slightly slower, then fman with huge delay of 2-3 seconds.ĭidn't compare other functions like File Search because they are not implemented on all applications.īottom line: Great job with the efficient implementation, Mike. To make it more comparable, I used a folder with few items. The startup time obviously also depends on the folder displayed at the start. Maybe due to the platform-independent Python architecture? GUI functions (resizing window.) bearly usable. NC, Marta: Almost not noticeable delay, GUI responsiveness was not affected.ĬRAX, Commander One: Noticeable delay, GUI responsiveness slightly more sluggish.įman: Huge delay, about 7 seconds of spinning beach ball. Opening a folder with 2000+ items (happens often in my work) lead to following results: OS effects like caching obviously play a big role.īut what did I notice is that GUI responsiveness really depends on the amount of items in the panel. Out of curiosity, I made a few simple performance experiments with NC (1.2.2) and some of its competitors, Commander One (1.), Crax (1.10.13), fman (0.6.9) and Marta (0.4.3) on my Mid-2014 MBP i7 with Apple SSD.įor basic file operations, I didn't find significant performance differences, between local or remote locations. Maybe this is of interest for some of you.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |